Overland Motor Co. v. Tennant
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Rooney, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes
This was an action upon a written contract tried before the court without a jury. Whether the plaintiff, who is plaintiff in error here, was entitled to recover depended upon the construction the court put upon the contract, as practically admitted by the parties at the close of the evidence. That involved a question of law, but no propositions of law were submitted to the court to be held as such, nor were there any rulings on evidence that present the questions of law argued. We have no means, therefore, of determining what principles of law the court applied to the contract herein.
We held…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Climax Tag Co. v. American Tag Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Grabbs v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Jacobson v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dandyline Co. v. LinskAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RoederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920