Dandyline Co. v. Linsk
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmtjnd K. Jabeoki, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1918.
1Dissent
Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson
dissenting: I am unable to concur in the foregoing decision. There is a direct conflict in our decisions in Illinois on the question of the necessity of having the trial court pass upon propositions of law in order to preserve issues of law for review in this court, in a case which has been tried by the court below without a jury. On the one hand we have the following cases holding that the Appellate Court in reviewing such a case may pass upon such issues of law as may be involved even though no propositions of law were submitted to the trial court: West Chicago…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Bradish v. YocumIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- West Chicago Park Commissioners v. KincadeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- City of Chicago v. BartelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- United States Brewing Co. v. WolfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.