Legal Opinion
Mulholland v. Dietz Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 94-3517PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 179 (1994)
John MULHOLLAND and Pamela Mulholland
v.
DIETZ COMPANY and Entwistle Corporation.
Civ. A. No. 94-3517.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
December 5, 1994.
Harry J. Oxman, Oxman, Levitan & Goodstadt, Philadelphia, PA, for John Mulholland and Pamela Mulholland.
Stephen M. Calder, Palmer Biezup & Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, for Dietz Co. and Entwistle Corp.
A. Gale Seider, Davis, Riter, Parry & Hartmann, Philadelphia, PA, for Livengrin Foundation, Inc.
ORDER-MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 1994, Livengrin Foundation, Inc.'s motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Premack v. J.C.J. Ogar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- O'Boyle v. JensenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dennie v. University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gormley v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Mosier v. American Home Patient, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
- Pulliam v. FannieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.