Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Fannie
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
CAVANAUGH, J.:
¶ 1 Deri Pulliam, III, was intoxicated when he faded to negotiate a turn while driving on Anderson Road in Clinton Township, Butler County. Mr. Pulliam was the sole occupant of the vehicle and suffered a traumatic spinal cord injury as a result of the accident. He filed a lawsuit against the Bakerstown Hotel and its owner, claiming that the defendants were liable for his damages under Pennsylvania’s Dram Shop Act, 47 P.S. §§ 4-493, because they served him alcoholic beverages while he was visibly intoxicated, proximately causing his injuries. He appeals from judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. GaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Callahan v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Cave v. Wampler Foods, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Rogers, G. v. Thomas, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Cave v. Wampler Foods, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pellecia v. Chen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2015