Legal Opinion

Ditty v. Farley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRedding, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is a statutory action based on ORS 30.020 to recover damages for the death of Sakuyo Kawamoto, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Joseph Richard Farley. The plaintiff, as personal representative of the decedent, has brought this action for the benefit of decedent’s husband, who succumbed approximately one hour after decedent’s death from injuries received in the same accident. The death of the decedent resulted from an automobile accident which occurred in Malheur County on June 29, 1956, involving a head-on collision between a car being driven by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Brubaker v. Iowa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kahn v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Johnson v. Los Angeles-Seattle Motor Express, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nelson v. Northern Leasing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API