Legal Opinion
Weiss v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 2017No. 16 Civ. 7660 (AKH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.:
Plaintiff David Weiss (“Weiss”) brought this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12191 et seq, against his employer, defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings Inc. (“Macy’s”). Weiss alleges that his employer harassed him because of his learning disability, failed to accommodate him, and terminated his employment because of his disability. Macy’s has moved to stay this action and compel arbitration of Weiss’ claims. Macy’s contends that Weiss agreed to resolve all…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re the Arbitration Between Albrecht Chemical Co. & Anderson Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 7 W. 57th St. Realty Co. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Sunedison, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Pettersen v. Volcano CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020