Legal Opinion

Lang v. Morey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. The action was brought to cancel the mortgage mentioned in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The tract of land involved herein was entered at the proper land-office on the 18th of March, 1878, by one James Lang, under the provisions of the homestead law of 1862, (Rev. St. U. S. § 2290, et seg.) Upon the 13th day of December, 1881, Lang executed and delivered to the defendant herein, for a valuable consideration, a mortgage upon said premises, containing the usual covenants. October 14,1883, he made final proof, receiving a certificate thereof, and upon June 15, 1884, a patent for said tract of land was issued to Lang by the general government. Later, but prior to the commencement of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Red River & Lake of the Woods Railroad v. StureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Orr v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Spiess v. NeubergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Townsend v. FentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Lewis v. WetherellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Adam v. McClintockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stark v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Doran v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API