Legal Opinion
New Departure Mfg. Co. v. Rockwell-Drake Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 29, 1922No. 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The first defense above outlined, was pleaded as a basis for so reforming the contract of 1903 as to express the thought that plaintiff engaged (in effect) to retain defendant Rockwell in general management of its business or a great part thereof. The pleader’s object was, after establishing the reformed contract, to prove a breach by the dropping of Rockwell from all high corporate place, and then to obtain, as a result of such breach by plaintiff, reconveyance or surrender of the patent in suit. In a manner and for reasons not material, the effort to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Irvine v. IrvineSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Page v. HigginsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Reis v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Vacuum Engineering Co. v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education Soc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Telling v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- Tinsel Corp. of America v. B. Haupt & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.