Legal Opinion
Tinsel Corp. of America v. B. Haupt & Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1928No. 1854PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This suit is brought in equity for an injunction and for damages for the alleged infringement by the defendants of patent No. 1,248,222, issued to William Weckesser, for insulated reflector, dated November 27, 1917, on an application filed November 29, 1916, the title to which passed to the plaintiff by assignment.
The defendants by answer raise the issues of invalidity and noninfringement.
The defendant Lena Haupt died prior thereto, and, when the suit came on for trial, it was on motion discontinued as to her.
The ’ defendants Rudolph Haupt and Bernard Haupt are,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Pyrene Mfg. Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Reis v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trico Products Corporation v. Ace Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1929
- Breese v. Tampax, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Radio Corp. of America v. Majestic Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Darman Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1940