Legal Opinion

United States v. Cox & Fahner

United States Customs Court

Decided November 23, 1948No. 7627; Entry Nos. 896373; 3493, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are applications by the Government for review of a decision of the trial court (Tilson, J.) holding that the merchandise herein was dutiable at certain enumerated amounts on the basis of export value. Cox & Fahner (Steel Union Sheet Piling, Inc.) et al. v. United States, 15 Cust. Ct. 451, Reap. Dec. 6232.

The merchandise covered by these applications is described as steel rounds,- steel flats, and steel squares, all of which are considered .to be steel bars. Claims as to all other merchandise were abandoned at the trial by counsel for the importers. The merchandise was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Cox v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. United States v. CoxUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API