United States v. Cox
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
OBDEB
Keefe, Judge:
Motion before us here was made by the Govern-, ment to dismiss as premature the importers’ application for review of the trial court’s interlocutory order of June 22, 1942, published in Reap. Dec. 5665, and also the order of August 10, 1942.,(not published..
*536The record discloses that the reappraisements involved certain merchandise appraised on the basis of foreign value. The trial court, in reviewing the facts, found that there was no foreign value for the .merchandise and also no export or United States value, and issued the order following:
Although, in my opinion, the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Cox & FahnerUnited States Customs Court · 1948