Legal Opinion

Brents v. Haynes & Boone

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-0278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this legal-malpractice case is whether the rule we announced in Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1991), tolled the statute of limitations on the plaintiffs’ claims. The court of appeals held that it did not, and affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant on limitations grounds. 10 S.W.3d 772.

In light of our recent decisions in Apex Towing Co. v. Tolin, 2001 WL 427374 (Tex.2001), and Underkofler v. Vanasek, 53 S.W.3d 343 (Tex.2001), without hearing oral argument, we grant the petition for review without reference to the merits, vacate the court of appeals’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Underkofler v. VanasekTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Brents v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brents v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. Eiland v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API