Legal Opinion

American Indians Residing on the Maricopa-Ak Chin Reservation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1981No. 235PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on the exceptions of the parties to the recommended decision of *169Trial Judge Kenneth R. Harkins, filed September 16, 1980, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s comprehensive opinion, as hereinafter set forth,* we hereby affirm and adopt the decision as the basis for our judgment in this case, with the deletion of his discussion as to plaintiffs remedies on potential claims that arose after August 13, 1946. As to this matter, we add the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Plaintiffs v. The Board of Oil and Gas Conservation of the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Ellen Moose v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API