Legal Opinion

Ellen Moose v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1982No. 80-4373PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellants are Indian children, members of the Southern Paiute tribe, who assert that the federal government has misman*1279aged their share of a fund Congress appropriated in 1965 to satisfy a judgment in favor of the tribe. Appellants say that the government at times paid no interest on their share of the fund, at other times paid interest at less than the maximum allowable rate, and since 1972 has allowed a bank to invest the money in securities not guaranteed as federal law requires. Appellants characterize this conduct as a breach of trust obligations for which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Holloman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Carlos Soler v. Roger F. Scott, Warden, Fci-Safford, Az United States Bureau of Prisons U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Holloman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Cobell v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API