Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Todd Hewitt, Relator v. Honorable Kristine Kerr, Judge, Circuit Court for St. Louis County, Missouri

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 28, 2015No. SC93846Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRichard B. Teitelman, Judge

I concur with the per curiam opinion to the extent it holds that mandamus is an appropriate remedy, that the NFL dispute resolution guidelines were not incorporated into Hewitt’s contract, and that designating the NFL commissioner as the arbitrator is unconscionable. I respectfully dissent from the per curiam opinion to the extent it holds that Hewitt should be compelled to arbitrate the underlying dispute. The per curiam opinion holds that the arbitration agreement is enforceable even though the essential terms of the alleged agreement as set forth in the NFL dispute resolution guidelines…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Ahrens v. DoddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Olson v. Curators of the University of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Johnson v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Dayton v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API