Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. Dodd

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1992No. 60548PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appellants Theodore Ahrens (Purchaser) and Patricia Ahrens sought specific performance of a real estate contract and in the alternative, $200,000. The circuit court found the specific performance claim was barred by the statute of frauds and granted Respondent Charles Dodd’s (Landowner’s) motion to dismiss. In a subsequent proceeding, the court sustained Landowner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on the money claim. Purchaser appeals both decisions. We affirm in part, reverse in part.

In his petition, Purchaser asserts the following. Purchaser and Landowner entered into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. LinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Saxton v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bakewell v. Missouri State Employees' Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Vess Beverages, Inc. v. The Paddington Corporation, Morgan Furze, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Crawford v. DetringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Johnson v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Rone v. ReevesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. James W. Smith v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API