Legal Opinion

Doe v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1984No. 2340PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the common pleas court which sustained preliminary objections to appellants’ petition for declaratory relief. Appellants sought a determination by declaratory judgment that the statute of limitations does not begin to run in asbestos related disease cases until the injured person is actually disabled. The court, by grant of preliminary objection, refused to make such a determination and since we agree with this disposition, we affirm of the order of the trial court.

Appellants, John and Mary Doe, 1 assert that the husband appellant has worked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Charles Sean Kruzits and Mary Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc. Heller Financial, Inc. Gosiger, Inc. v. Vincent W. Visco, D/B/A Vistek Industries, Third-Party Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Berardi v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Wagner v. Apollo Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API