Legal Opinion

In re Grossman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Isadore Grossman, bankrupt. On ' petition to review the action of the referee in excluding from consideration votes cast by a commissioner of deeds acting under a power of attorney acknowledged before himself.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

[1] The power is so drawn as to run to two persons—one, the attorney who- brings on this proceeding; and the other, the commissioner ofi deeds, who is in the attorney’s office.

I see no reason to- disagree with the ruling of Brown, J., in the case relied upon by the referee, In re Sugenheimer (D. C., N. Y.) 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 425, 91 Fed. 744; and Mr. Joffe has furnished a long and accurate list of decisions to the same effect in other states. I am content to- follow, not only Judge Brown’s ruling, but that of our state courts in Armstrong v. Combs, 15 App. Div. 246, 44 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. CombsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. In re SugenheimerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Deena Woolen Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1953
  2. In Re Sandhurst Securities, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. In Re G.E.C. Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. In the Matter of Columbus Brass& Aluminum Company, Inc., Bankrupt. American Alloys Corporation v. Ivan H. Morgan, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API