Legal Opinion

People v. Archuleta

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1995No. 95SA189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of mis conduct in this lawyer discipline proceeding. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in a range of 30 days to six months for neglecting two separate legal matters entrusted to him. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be suspended for six months with certain conditions for restitution prior to reinstatement. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FriedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. KocelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API