Legal Opinion

People v. Fried

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1995No. 95SA193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipula tion, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel, C.R.C.P. 241.18, and recommended that the respondent be suspended for thirty days from the practice of law. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1990. Count I of the conditional admission recounts that the respondent was hired in June 1992 to represent a person who was a partner in a venture to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FritscheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PrimaveraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. HardingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. McClungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API