Legal Opinion
Fantasia v. Tony Pantano Mason Contractors, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 13, 1999No. AC 17897PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
This appeal arises out of the workers’ compensation review board’s reversal and remand of *195the workers’ compensation commissioner’s (commissioner) determination that the injuries received by the plaintiff, Richard Fantasia, in an automobile accident that occurred as he was returning home from a workers’ compensation hearing, arose out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant employer, Tony Pantano Mason Contractors, Inc. (Pantano), and were therefore compensable. We conclude that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide this appeal because the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Mund v. Farmers' Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Tardy v. Abington Constructors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Melendez v. Valley Metallurgical Processing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- O'Connor v. Med-Center Home Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Fantasia v. Tony Pantana Mason Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999