Legal Opinion

Careaga v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1925No. Docket No. 4364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

The purpose of the action herein involved is to obtain a decree of court setting aside as fraudulent and void, first, a deed to certain real property comprising 268 acres of land, made by one Thomas W. Moore to his wife, Mary Theresa Moore, who is one of the defendants; secondly, a deed covering the same property, made by said Mary Theresa Moore to defendants Fox; thirdly, a mortgage likewise conveying the same property, executed by defendants Fox to Santa Barbara Trust and Savings Bank' and assigned to the defendant Commercial Trust and Savings Bank; and, finally, to have said property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Spottiswood v. WeirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Windhaus v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Threlkel v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Servel v. CorbettIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Schwartz v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Haller v. HallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API