Legal Opinion

Mead v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1972No. 1430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

In 1961, Edward Mead and two code-fendants, Henderson and Shott, were convicted of two counts of burglary. Thereafter, the three filed a notice of appeal and a petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Exercising its discretionary power under Alaska’s then applicable procedural rule, the superior court denied the petition to proceed in forma pauperis, and the appeal was not prosecuted. In 1969, Mead filed an application for post-conviction relief. 1 The superior court denied Mead’s application on condition that he request this court to grant him an extension of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Quick v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fajeriak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lemon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API