Lawrence v. Schaefer
New York Supreme Court
Action on a’Lloyds policy.
1Opinion of the CourtSpbiNg, J.
This action was tried without a jury, and involves the question of the right of the insured in a Lloyds policy to sue each of the underwriters to recover for a loss within the terms *240of the policy.' The policy in suit was issued by twenty-five underwriters, and is signed, not by them personally, but by C. Hagen, their attorney. By the terms of the policy, the personal liability of each underwriter is limited to $200 in the event of loss, and-is individual and several. Then occur the following clauses, which comprise the nub of the controversy.in this action: “Ho action shall be brought to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of of N.Y., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Mead v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Knorr v. BatesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Leiter v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Knorr v. BatesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Compton v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Playman v. Commercial UnderwritersOregon Supreme Court · 1916