United States of America, Tulalip Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
The Lummi Indian Tribe appeals from a judgment holding that in 1855 certain waters in the northern part of Puget Sound were usual and accustomed fishing grounds of the Tulalip Tribes. We affirm.
I
The United States and various tribes, including predecessors to the Lummi and Tulalip Tribes, entered into the Treaty of Elliott Point in 1855. Article V of the Treaty reserves to signatory tribes “[t]he right of taking fish at usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory....” 12 Stat. 927, 928.
In 1975 we affirmed the decision of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Robert Floyd Ashley, AKA Robert Ashley, Debtor. Robert Floyd Ashley, AKA Robert Ashley v. C. Eugene Church Helen L. ChurchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.