Legal Opinion

State v. Cofer

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2011No. 29,717; 33,096PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1} Defendant Bryan Cofer appeals his conviction for shoplifting merchandise worth over $500, a fourth-degree felony, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-20(B)(3) (2006). On appeal, we address his arguments that (1) the district court abused its discretion in admitting improper hearsay evidence by allowing the State’s only witness to testify to statements from a report that was not admitted into evidence, and (2) the State failed to present sufficient evidence that the market value of the merchandise was over $500. We reverse Defendant’s conviction because the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  3. Lauder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. State v. MorelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ingles Markets, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ImperialNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. GrubbNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Bank of New York v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API