Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. Romero

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2014No. Docket 33,224PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIELS, Justice.

{1} We granted certiorari to review recurring procedural and substantive issues in home mortgage foreclosure actions. We hold that the Bank of New York did not establish its lawful standing in this case to file a home mortgage foreclosure action. We also hold that a borrower’s ability to repay a home mortgage loan is one of the “borrower’s circumstances” that lenders and courts must consider in determining compliance with the New Mexico Home Loan Protection Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 58-21A-1 to -14 (2003, as amended through 2009) (the HLPA), which prohibits home mortgage…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Phoenix Funding, LLC v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. First Baptist Church of Roswell v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bank of New York Mellon v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API