Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 1, 1957No. 37549PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
On the 14th day of January, 1956, Ben Y. Staton, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that on the 14th day of September, 1955, while employed as a mechanic by the City of Tulsa he sustained an injury to the second finger of his right hand. An award was made by the State Industrial Commission for temporary disability and 50 per cent loss of the finger and this proceeding is brought by the City of Tulsa, hereinafter called petitioner, to review the award.
The cause and extent of the disability are not issues. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Gooldy v. LawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Montgomery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- McDuffie v. Nash Neon Sign Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- City of Tulsa Water Department v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spraker v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Apache Motor Company v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Neal v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Richey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- City of Oklahoma City v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.