Legal Opinion

Spraker v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1966No. 41964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which this court is asked to assume original jurisdiction and issue a writ of prohibition preventing the respondent district judge from exercising further jurisdiction in a damage suit in his court.

Applicants, defendants in the damage suit, are the owners and operators of a used car lot. They argue that under the undisputed facts in this case the sole remedy of their injured employee (Plaintiff in the damage suit) lies in a proceeding against themselves and their insurance carrier in the State Industrial Court under the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gooldy v. LawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Creighton v. District Court of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Skelly Oil Company v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Rider v. Bob Hiner Service StationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Cross Ex Rel. Cross v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. People Ex Rel. No. 3 J. & E. Discount, Inc. v. WhitlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Woods v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Neal v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API