Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Houk

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 18, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00488Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL K BAILEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:21-cv-488 v. Judge James L. Graham Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson MARC HOUK, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Defendants Marc Houk’s and Kathleen Kovach’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 6). For the following reasons, the Undersigned RECOMMENDS Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner currently incarcerated at Marion Correctional…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API