Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2000No. 98-50410, 98-50411PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Federal prisoners Steven Lee Thomas and Hashim Esteban Thomas appeal the district court’s order -dismissing their 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions as untimely filed. We affirm the district court’s determination that the - Thomases’ § 2255 motions were untimely, although for reasons different than those articulated by- the district court.

I

In 1995, brothers Steven and Hashim Thomas were convicted on federal charges arising from their robbery of the Norman- ■ gee State Bank in Normangee, Texas. Their convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, and this Court issued final mandates…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Quentin Miller, A/K/A "Q" Quentin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Christopher SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Ronald Washington, A.K.A. Boo Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Felipe Arrevalo Garcia,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. James Calvin SegersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Crutcher v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. PlascenciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API