Hodgson v. Minnesota
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
497 U.S. 417 (1990)
HODGSON ET AL.
v.
MINNESOTA ET AL.
No. 88-1125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued November 29, 1989
Decided June 25, 1990.[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Janet Benshoof argued the cause for petitioners in No. 88-1125 and respondents in No. 88-1309. With her on the briefs were Rachel N. Pine, Lynn M. Paltrow, Kathryn Kolbert, John A. Powell, William Z. Pentelovitch, and Rebecca A. Palmer.
John R. Tunheim, Chief Deputy Attorney General of Minnesota, argued the cause for respondents in No. 88-1125 and petitioners in No. 88-1309. With…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Marshall; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Scalia; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kennedy.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016