Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1987PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Petitioners, two New Jersey corporations doing business in New York and the president of both corporations, have moved to quash subpoenas requiring them to produce records kept in New Jersey for inspection by a New York County Grand Jury investigating complaints of Medicaid fraud. The sole issue on appeal is whether the issuance of compulsory process pursuant to CPL 640.10, the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State in Criminal Proceedings, is the exclusive means by which an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Standard Fruit & Steamship Co. v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brennick v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Yeary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. AlnuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.