Legal Opinion
People v. Najar
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1998No. Docket 206084PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant David R. Najar appeals by leave granted an order denying his timely request for the appointment of appellate counsel following his plea of guilty. We reverse and remand for appointment of counsel.
1. UNDERLYING FACTS
On December 5, 1995, defendant pleaded guilty of one count of delivery of marijuana, MCL 333.7401(2)(d); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(d), and to the supplemental charge of habitual offender, fourth offense, MCL 769.12; MSA 28.1084. In exchange for the plea, the prosecution agreed to dismiss one count of felon in possession of a firearm and to recommend a minimum sentence within the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burns v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. CobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BulgerMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Tesmer v. GranholmDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- People v. ToosonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.