T.B. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court determined that R.C., the natural child of T.B., is a child in need of aid under AS 47.10.010(a)(2)(A), (C), and (F), and that it is in the best interests of R.C. for the State to retain custody of him for two years. T.B., R.C.’s mother, who was earing for R.C. until the State interceded, now brings this appeal.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
T.B. is R.C.’s mother. A Colorado court terminated her parental rights in 1988, after finding that she had abandoned R.C. and had not complied with a rehabilitation plan. The Colorado court awarded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of SD, Jr.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- A.H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- RITA T. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of SAAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pravat P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Sherman B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Sherman B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- In re J.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of JAAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.