Legal Opinion

In Re Peacock's Will

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1923No. 10030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action originated in the county court of Nowata county by S.A. Miller filing a petition to probate the last will and testament of Rosie Peacock, who died in Nowata county December 19, 1916. To the petition was attached a copy of a will which named Catherine Miller as sole beneficiary and S.A. Miller as sole executor. James Peacock filed a petition contesting the probate of said will, alleging he was the father of Rosie Peacock, and the will was void for the reason the testatrix was a full-blood member of the Five Civilized Tribes, and the will was not executed as provided in section 23…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re MadalinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. David V.R. v. Wanda J.D.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Pérez Nieves v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  3. Asbill v. YkemaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. In Re Estate of TytanicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. In Re Estate of TytanicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API