Legal Opinion

Craig v. Maher

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 15, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts necessary for the determination of this appeal from a denial of welfare assistance are not in dispute. In September, 1974, the plaintiffs, Louise Craig and her two minor children, moved to Connecticut. On October 9, 1974, the plaintiff mother applied for assistance under the aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) program. Her application was denied and the denial was upheld by a welfare department hearing officer. The plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Common Pleas under General Statutes § 17-2b which authorizes an applicant, “if aggrieved,” to obtain judicial review of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Phaneuf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Harkins v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Goldfeld v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Day v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Fareri v. Greenwich inland/wetlands, No. Cv96 0151183 S (Oct. 21, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Jack's Chevrolet v. Colchester Hist. Dist., No. 09 02 11 (Oct. 1, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API