Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided May 28, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for Carrying on the Business of a Retail Liquor Dealer, without payment of the tax. On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtShiras, J.

The indictment in this cause charged the defendant with a violation of section 3242 of the Revised Statutes, in that he was carrying on the business of a retail liquor dealer at Sioux City,' Iowa, without *737having paid the special tax imposed upon such dealers by the statutes of the United Stales. The evidence adduced on the trial showed that the defendant had undertaken the business of procuring and furnishing to any one who would patronize him liquors, spirituous and malt, in quantities loss than five gallons, lie had a place of business, in which was found by the state officers, having a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  2. Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Quinn v. DimondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API