Legal Opinion

Clark v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1914No. 4051PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota; Charles A. Willard, Judge. Sam H. Clark and C. H. Crockard were convicted of knowingly depositing with an express company an obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

CAREAND, Circuit Judge.

Clark and Crockard were indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced in the District Court for the District of North Dakota on counts 2 and 25 of an indictment which charged them with violating section 245 of the Penal Code. That section, so far as material, was as follows :

“Whoever shall bring or cause to be brought into the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, from any foreign country, or shall therein knowingly deposit or cause to be deposited with any express company or other common carrier, for carriage from one state * * * to any other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. One Book Entitled Ulysses by James JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  4. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. GordonPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API