Legal Opinion

Shazer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 2009No. 4D07-4646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ingram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. McKinney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011