McKinney v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in McKinney v. State, 24 So.3d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Shazer v. State, 3 So.3d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Because we find our decision in Valdes v. State, 3 So.3d 1067 (Fla.2009), controlling, we disapprove of the Fourth District’s decision in Shazer and approve the Fifth District’s decision in McKinney.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. HegstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Borges v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Pizzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marvin Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Demeko Ladjuan Sims v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Rimondi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Estremera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.