Legal Opinion
Meinhardt v. Unisys Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 22, 1999No. Nos. 98-1007, 98-1037PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
OPINION OF THE COURT
This action, brought by employees who had participated in individual account pension plans maintained by their employer Unisys Corporation (“Unisys”), charged essentially that Unisys and the individual defendants1 had breached their fiduciary duties prescribed by ERISA2 by investing in Executive Life Insurance Guaranteed Investment Contracts (“GICs”). After a bench trial, the District Court granted judgment for all defendants, ruling in their favor on all issues related to the breach of fiduciary duty claims, thus denying all relief and damages to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.