People v. La Cava
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and new trial granted. Memorandum: We hold that the unprofessional and egregiously improper comments of the Assistant District Attorney in summation were so prejudicial as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109-110; People v Rivera, 75 AD2d 544). The remarks to which defense counsel objected included the following: "Mr. Panzarella is trying to evoke sympathy for George La Cava. I say we are well rid of him and it doesn’t bother me one bit to say that that man is a liar and a thief, because that’s exactly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. LovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. ShanisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. GriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. WhitehurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001