Legal Opinion
United States v. Minnesota Trust Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1995No. 94-1290PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Minnesota Trust Company appeals the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment to the United States of America on the United States’ complaint seeking judgment on the breach of an immigration bond issued by Minnesota Trust’s bonding agent. Minnesota Trust argues that it is not liable on the immigration bond because the bonding agent had no authority to issue the immigration bond and because Minnesota Trust did not receive notice to produce the alien or notice of the alleged breach of the immigration bond in time to protect its rights in administrative…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- PATELBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. American Bonding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James Harold Craft, Harold A. Craft and Valerie Craft, American Druggist Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Microvote Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Baljinder Singh v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Fuentes-Argueta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Edgar Jose Rodriguez-Cuate v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General, 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.