Legal Opinion

Voss v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge SMITH.

The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) filed a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to the petition for review in the nature of a writ of mandamus filed by Frank Voss. This case is one of first impression for the Court. Voss requests the Court to determine that Section 1 of the act commonly known as the Parole Act (Act), Act of August 6, 1941, P.L. 861, as amended by the Act of December 18, 1996, P.L. 1098, 61 P.S. § 331.1, is inapplicable to persons seeking parole rather than to those already on parole. He also requests the Court to vacate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Coady v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Reider v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilbur Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Evans v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Mickens-Thomas v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Barnes v. WenerowiczDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Williams v. WorleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API