Rummel v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
1. Appellant Kenneth Rummel appeals from a district court order granting two motions for partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Harbor Insurance Company (Harbor) and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insuranee Company (St. Paul). 1 The district court found that, as a matter of law, neither insurance company was exposed to liability for a judgment entered against their insured, Circle K. On appeal we address whether the district court erred in concluding as a matter of law that neither the Harbor, nor the St. Paul, insurance policies provided coverage for the judgment. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Celaya v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Kitchell v. Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.