Legal Opinion
Eaton Corp. v. Maslym Holding Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 28, 1996No. Civil Action 95-5941 (MTB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendants Maslym Holding Company (“Maslym”) and Heinemann Electric (Europe) S.A. (“Heinemann Europe”) for dismissal of the complaint for lack of in person-am jurisdiction or, in the alternative, on the basis of forum non conveniens. The court has reviewed the submissions of the parties without oral argument pursuant .to Fed. R.Civ.P. 78.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A. The Parties
Plaintiff Eaton Corporation seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the parties’ rights under a Trademark License Agreement (“Trademark…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- CSR Ltd. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Exton v. Our Farm, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- CSR Ltd. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- North Sails Group, LLC v. Boards & More GMBHSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.