CSR Ltd. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Amended Opinion
ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion by certain defendants 1 (“defendants”) for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of in personum jurisdiction and on a motion by defendants for dismissal on the grounds of forum non conveniens. The plaintiffs, CSR Limited and CSR America, Inc., (“plaintiffs”) have opposed the motions. For reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss for lack of in personum jurisdiction and the motion to dismiss on the grounds oí forum non conveniens are DENIED.
I. Background
CSR Limited is a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TH Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC v. Ace European Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Miller v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- CSr Ltd. v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Filler v. LernoutDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.