Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. Codee Lamaster (mem. dec.)

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 72A01-1702-CR-227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarteau, Senior Judge

Statement of the Case

Codee Lamaster’s plea agreement provided for potential sentence modification by the trial court without objection by *632the State upon Lamaster’s successful completion of the Purposeful Incarceration Program while serving his executed sentence in the'Indiana Department of Correction, Lamaster was terminated from the program, but, nonetheless, requested sentence modification, which the trial court granted. The State argues .that the trial court’s modification of Lamaster’s sentence violated the terms of the fixed plea agreement and was not otherwise authorized by-statute. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gardiner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Derek L. Moore v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Bryant T. Harris v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API