Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Crone, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Alberto Baiza Rodriguez appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence, which was imposed pursuant to a written plea agreement containing a fixed sentence of seventy-two months executed on work release. Rodriguez argues that modification of his sentence is permissible under Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-17(l), which provides that a person may not waive the right to sentence modification as part of a plea agreement. We agree and therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] Based on an incident that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leonard L. Suggs v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Badger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Indiana v. Pebble StaffordIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Indiana v. Pebble StaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.