Legal Opinion

Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 2018No. 20A03-1704-CR-724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crone, Judge.

Case Summary

[1] Alberto Baiza Rodriguez appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence, which was imposed pursuant to a written plea agreement containing a fixed sentence of seventy-two months executed on work release. Rodriguez argues that modification of his sentence is permissible under Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-17(l), which provides that a person may not waive the right to sentence modification as part of a plea agreement. We agree and therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] Based on an incident that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leonard L. Suggs v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Badger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State of Indiana v. Pebble StaffordIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State of Indiana v. Pebble StaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API